<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Aptitude Testing &#8211; rightpeople.com.au</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au/category/aptitude-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.rightpeople.com.au</link>
	<description>Australian Psychometric Aptitude and Skills Tests</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:56:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Multitasking Ability and Intelligence</title>
		<link>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/multitasking-ability-intelligence/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rightpeople]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2018 04:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aptitude Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Shakhar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multitasking]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychometrics-blog.rightpeople.com.au/?p=571</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When dividing attention between two tasks (Multitasking), people need to find the most efficient ways of allocating their attentional or processing resources between the tasks. It is reasonable to presume that people with higher levels of intelligence will be better able to allocate their processing resources efficiently. This was investigated in a study by Ben-Shakhar [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au/multitasking-ability-intelligence/">Multitasking Ability and Intelligence</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au">rightpeople.com.au</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personality Factors &#8211; Importance of the Big 5</title>
		<link>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/importance-big-5-personality-factors/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rightpeople]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 08:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aptitude Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recruitment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aptitude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conscientiousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture Openness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dependability Conscientiousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emotional Stability Neuroticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Personality Assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personality Assessment History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychometric Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgency Extraversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sydney]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychometrics-blog.rightpeople.com.au/?p=777</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the world of personality assessment there are numerous tools that are used to measure and understand personality. A trait approach to personality has been in existence since the early 1900&#8217;s, and it has been the aim of many researchers to identify which are the most useful underlying factors to consider &#8211; with numerous studies dedicated [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au/importance-big-5-personality-factors/">Personality Factors &#8211; Importance of the Big 5</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au">rightpeople.com.au</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ambiverts, Extraverts, and Sales Job Performance</title>
		<link>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/864/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rightpeople]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 04:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aptitude Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recruitment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RightPeople News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambivert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambiverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big 5 personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extravert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extraverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Job Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales personality]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychometrics-blog.rightpeople.com.au/?p=864</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this article we look at Ambiverts, Extraverts, and Sales Job Performance and announce the new Accounts Payable and Receivable Test Sales Aptitude Personality Research Article Highlights Extraversion vs Introversion is one of the most studied personality dimensions. It was a long-held belief that extraversion would &#8220;take a person further&#8221; in business, particularly in sales. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au/864/">Ambiverts, Extraverts, and Sales Job Performance</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au">rightpeople.com.au</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speed, working memory and ageing</title>
		<link>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/speed-working-memory-and-ageing/</link>
					<comments>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/speed-working-memory-and-ageing/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rightpeople]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 05:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aptitude Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recruitment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Psychologist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychometrics-blog.rightpeople.com.au/?p=432</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Numerous authors have examined the relationship between speed of processing, working memory and age, and debated the role of these concepts in understanding individual differences in cognitive ability. There are arguments as to the relative contributions of both concepts, and most theorists tend to agree that slowing is the explanation for cognitive decline. Using tasks [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au/speed-working-memory-and-ageing/">Speed, working memory and ageing</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au">rightpeople.com.au</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/speed-working-memory-and-ageing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research shows: cognitive tests strongly predict job performance</title>
		<link>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/research-shows-cognitive-tests-strongly-predict-job-performance/</link>
					<comments>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/research-shows-cognitive-tests-strongly-predict-job-performance/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rightpeople]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 01:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aptitude Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recruitment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anderson Salgado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom Bertua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychometrics-blog.rightpeople.com.au/?p=407</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A meta-analysis conducted in the United Kingdom (Bertua, Anderson &#38; Salgado, 2005) has found that intelligence tests and tests of  specific cognitive abilities are strong, reliable and valid predictors of both job performance  and response to training.  Operational validities are in the range of .5-.6, meaning that these  cognitive tests can account for approximately 30% of the variance in job performance [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au/research-shows-cognitive-tests-strongly-predict-job-performance/">Research shows: cognitive tests strongly predict job performance</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au">rightpeople.com.au</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/research-shows-cognitive-tests-strongly-predict-job-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Work safety needs a human touch</title>
		<link>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/work-safety-needs-a-human-touch/</link>
					<comments>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/work-safety-needs-a-human-touch/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rightpeople]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 02:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aptitude Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific & Custom Tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conscientiousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychometrics-blog.rightpeople.com.au/?p=348</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Most organisational occupational health and safety (OHS) interventions focus on controlling employee procedures and the physical work environment in an effort to maximise workplace safety.  While such efforts are important, they do not take into account the human factors related to work safety, such as individual and group attitudes and the influence of management. Recent [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au/work-safety-needs-a-human-touch/">Work safety needs a human touch</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au">rightpeople.com.au</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/work-safety-needs-a-human-touch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changing face of the workplace</title>
		<link>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/changing-face-of-the-workplace/</link>
					<comments>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/changing-face-of-the-workplace/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rightpeople]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 06:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aptitude Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recruitment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skills Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flinders University]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychometrics-blog.rightpeople.com.au/?p=338</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A large survey of Australian businesses conducted by the National Institute of Labour Studies at Flinders University and the National Centre for Vocational Education Research reveals some interesting findings about the significant ways in which employment patterns have changed in the last 20 years. They found that since 1992: There has been a significant shift away [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au/changing-face-of-the-workplace/">Changing face of the workplace</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au">rightpeople.com.au</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/changing-face-of-the-workplace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safety matters, just ask Orica!</title>
		<link>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/safety-matters-just-ask-orica/</link>
					<comments>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/safety-matters-just-ask-orica/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rightpeople]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 23:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aptitude Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recruitment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skills Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific & Custom Tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commitment Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment Protection Licence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OHS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychometrics-blog.rightpeople.com.au/?p=295</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Incidents such as the leak of the cancer-causing chemical hexavalent chromium by Orica in Newcastle in August last year highlight the importance of safety procedures and proper handling of health and safety incidents by organisations. Following the leak the plant was closed for 6 months, it reportedly lost $90 million in earnings, it faced court [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au/safety-matters-just-ask-orica/">Safety matters, just ask Orica!</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au">rightpeople.com.au</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/safety-matters-just-ask-orica/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assessment in Organisations &#8211; Current Status, Trends and Emerging Issues</title>
		<link>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/assessment-in-organisations-current-status-trends-and-emerging-issues/</link>
					<comments>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/assessment-in-organisations-current-status-trends-and-emerging-issues/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rightpeople]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 02:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aptitude Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recruitment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skills Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Specific & Custom Tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applied Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aptitude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conscientiousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ones Viswesveran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychometrics-blog.rightpeople.com.au/?p=207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Meta-analyses have revealed that the most valid predictors of job performance are ability measures (cognitive or intelligence tests) and personality assessments, particularly the &#8220;Big 5&#8221; personality traits, followed by structured job interviews. Together, ability tests and measures of conscientiousness or integrity provide an adjusted validity of 0.65 (Ones, Viswesveran, &#38; Schmidt, 1993; Ones &#38; Viswesveran, 1998). The [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au/assessment-in-organisations-current-status-trends-and-emerging-issues/">Assessment in Organisations &#8211; Current Status, Trends and Emerging Issues</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au">rightpeople.com.au</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/assessment-in-organisations-current-status-trends-and-emerging-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Identifying your strongest and weakest leaders</title>
		<link>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/identifying-your-strongest-and-weakest-leaders/</link>
					<comments>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/identifying-your-strongest-and-weakest-leaders/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rightpeople]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 04:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Aptitude Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skills Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resource Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMEI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maylett Riboldi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personnel Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walker Smither]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psychometrics-blog.rightpeople.com.au/?p=88</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The idea of a 360 degree performance appraisal is to survey those around an employee to gather information about their performance from the perspective of different individuals they interact with at work. Feedback is typically provided by subordinates, peers and supervisors, the individuals themselves (self-assessment), and may include feedback from customers or clients. &#8220;360&#8221; refers [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au/identifying-your-strongest-and-weakest-leaders/">Identifying your strongest and weakest leaders</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.rightpeople.com.au">rightpeople.com.au</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.rightpeople.com.au/identifying-your-strongest-and-weakest-leaders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
